More than a third of electro shock therapy patients given treatment without ...

More than a third of electro shock therapy patients given treatment without ...
More than a third of electro shock therapy patients given treatment without ...

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), where an electric shock of 70 to 450 volts is administered through a patient’s brain under general anaesthetic, has a long and controversial history.

The idea is that the treatment prompts a seizure-like fit, to ‘reset’ the brain’s malfunctioning circuitry that causes depressive and psychotic thoughts and behaviour — although the biological process for this has never fully been explained.

Every year around 2,500 people in the UK receive ECT. It is recommended by the treatment watchdog, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), for severe or psychotic depression that is resistant to other treatments such as medication.

But a newly published study suggests more than a third of those patients do not give their consent to undergoing it.

The report, in the journal Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, is based on Freedom of Information (FoI) requests sent to all the 56 trusts in England that provide mental health services — 37 responded.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), where an electric shock of 70 to 450 volts is administered through a patient’s brain under general anaesthetic, has a long and controversial history (stock image)

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), where an electric shock of 70 to 450 volts is administered through a patient’s brain under general anaesthetic, has a long and controversial history (stock image)

John Read, a professor of clinical psychology at the University of East London, who led the study, argues that providing the treatment without consent is equivalent to ‘people being given ECT against their will’.

He says the responses indicate that official safeguarding procedures, drawn up to protect patients who don’t consent to ECT, are not being followed.

‘Our research shows that there is no effective monitoring or regulation of ECT in England, due to the failure of the authorities to perform the checks that are required,’ he told Good Health.

Commenting on the research, Dr Lucy Johnstone, an independent consultant clinical psychologist, says that receiving ECT without consent can significantly worsen patients’ mental conditions.

‘ECT is very scary,’ she says. ‘My research into the treatment’s psychological impact, in the Journal of Mental Health in 1999, shows that it can be very re-traumatising to undergo it without consent.

‘Many of the patients given it for severe depression have previously suffered trauma through sexual abuse and violence,’ she told Good Health. ‘To be laid down on a table out of your control is re-traumatising.’

However, some argue that the patients are so unwell that they are incapable of giving consent.

‘These are people who are so depressively ill that they can’t speak; they may well be hallucinating or deluded and thus unable to give consent,’ says David Curtis, an honorary professor at the Centre for Psychiatry at Queen Mary University of London.

The idea is that the treatment prompts a seizure-like fit, to ‘reset’ the brain’s malfunctioning circuitry that causes depressive and psychotic thoughts and behaviour — although the biological process for this has never fully been explained (stock image)

The idea is that the treatment prompts a seizure-like fit, to ‘reset’ the brain’s malfunctioning circuitry that causes depressive and psychotic thoughts and behaviour — although the biological process for this has never fully been explained (stock image)

‘They are unable to make decisions about a treatment that all the professionals involved in their care have judged may help them.’

Furthermore, he maintains that ECT is safe and often effective. ‘It has been well studied over many decades,’ he says.

‘It is effective for people with severe depressive illness who have not adequately responded to antidepressants. Indeed, given the many documented side-effects of antidepressant drugs, I believe ECT is safer.’

Professor Curtis adds: ‘We recognise that consent is a troublesome area. But often, when we conclude that it is much better for patients to have ECT than not, a couple of months later the patients thank us for giving them the treatment.’

It might seem strange to think that people who have undergone such a scary-sounding procedure would be grateful. But Dr Rebecca Lawrence, a consultant psychiatrist working in Scotland, is one of them.

‘I have had several courses over the years to treat psychotic depression,’ she says. ‘The first was when I was pregnant with my first child. The most recent was three years ago. In total, I have had around 70 treatments.

‘Without it, I’m not sure I would have recovered to be with my family or to train as a psychiatrist. I would have it again, if I needed to. Although the basics — an electric current passed through your brain,

read more from dailymail.....

NEXT UK's prostate cancer revolution: 'Biggest trial in a generation' could lead to ... trends now