Actress Ashley Judd says she is not part of Harvey Weinstein's $44 million ...

Actress Ashley Judd has announced that she is not one of the victims named in shamed Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein’s tentative $44 million compensation deal – and insists she’ll be seeing him in court.

One of the first to accuse the movie mogul of sexual misconduct, Judd has accused Weinstein of derailing her career after allegedly rejecting his sexual advances during the 1990s in a lawsuit filed last year.

Following the announcement of Weinstein’s landmark settlement on Thursday, on Twitter, Judd made it abundantly clear she wasn’t among the claimants.

‘[My] case against Harvey Weinstein is ongoing and we intend to bring it to trial. [I’m] not a part of any settlement,’ Judd declared in a tweet on Thursday evening.

Actress Ashley Judd said she isn’t one of the victims named in shamed producer Harvey Weinstein’s tentative $44 million compensation deal

Actress Ashley Judd said she isn’t one of the victims named in shamed producer Harvey Weinstein’s tentative $44 million compensation deal

Judd has accused Weinstein of derailing her career after allegedly rejecting his sexual advances during the 1990s in a lawsuit filed last year

Judd has accused Weinstein of derailing her career after allegedly rejecting his sexual advances during the 1990s in a lawsuit filed last year

Since the 51-year-old accused Weinstein of historic sexual misconduct, more than 80 other woman have come forward to allege various degrees of wrongdoing against the once revered producer, including harassment and rape.

Weinstein has vehemently denied the slew of accusations which cite ‘non-consensual sexual activity’, but his legal woes have continued to mount.

Attorneys representing the claims against Weinstein said on Thursday that a deal between the 67-year-old, his accusers, his former film studio's board members and the New York attorney general's office has struck a settlement deal in excess of $44 million.

The grand sum, which lawyers revealed to a bankruptcy judge would be paid by insurance policies and not directly out of the pocket of Weinstein, also includes $14 million in legal fees for the accused, and $30 million in compensation for his alleged victims.

If finalized, it would also resolve a civil rights lawsuit filed by the New York attorney general's office last year that accuses Weinstein Co's executives and board of failing to protect employees from a hostile work environment and Weinstein's sexual misconduct, according to the Wall Street Journal.

It’s not currently clear who the recipients of the compensatory fund are, but the deal will not affect Weinstein's trial, which is set to begin on September 9.

‘[My] case against Harvey Weinstein is ongoing and we intend to bring it to trial. [I’m] not a part of any settlement,’ Judd declared in a tweet on Thursday evening (Pictured: Weinstein and Judd together with Vince Vaughn in 1997)

‘[My] case against Harvey Weinstein is ongoing and we intend to bring it to trial. [I’m] not a part of any settlement,’ Judd declared in a tweet on Thursday evening (Pictured: Weinstein and Judd together with Vince Vaughn in 1997)

Last week, Robert, Weinstein's brother suffered a big loss in court on May 14 when Judge Barbara Jaffe denied his motion to be dismissed as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by a former company employee.

It was also ordered that Robert submit his response to the initial complaint within 20 days, and a pre-trial hearing was set for late July.

Robert was named as a defendant in the

read more from dailymail.....

PREV Irish firefighter charged with raping Boston girl after St Patrick's Day parade ... trends now
NEXT One is highly amused - and I hope you are, too! As it's revealed that Her ... trends now