A Gaetz-crasher's guide: Here's why a Republican lawmaker was barred from closed-door testimony

sonos sonos One (Gen 2) - Voice Controlled Smart Speaker with Amazon Alexa Built-in - Black read more
Rep. Matt Gaetz, left, and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff. (Photos: Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images, Alex Brandon/AP)
Rep. Matt Gaetz, left, and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff. (Photos: Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images, Alex Brandon/AP)

When Republican congressman Matt Gaetz tried to attend an impeachment inquiry deposition Monday morning at the U.S. Capitol, he ran smack into the often arcane and confusing rules of Congress.

Gaetz, a rabble-rouser from Florida who accused Democrats of dirty tricks last fall, claimed that as a member of the House Judiciary Committee, he should be allowed to attend the deposition of Fiona Hill, President ’s former top Russia and Europe adviser.

The impeachment inquiry depositions are being held behind closed doors inside the U.S. Capitol. The House Intelligence Committee, chaired by California Democrat Adam Schiff, is running the meetings, but the investigation also includes the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, as well as the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

The depositions are run by committee staff. Members of Congress from these three committees are invited to attend and observe, but only staff are asking the questions.

When he showed up on Monday, Gaetz was told that because he was not a member of one of those three committees, he could not attend. A parliamentarian who interprets congressional rules was consulted and concurred that Gaetz could not attend.

Gaetz later complained on Twitter about the movement of the impeachment inquiry out of the Judiciary Committee, chaired by New York Democrat Jerry Nadler.

“Judiciary Chairman [Nadler] claimed to have begun the impeachment inquiry weeks ago,” he wrote. “Now, his own Judiciary members aren’t even allowed to participate in it.”

Nadler’s Judiciary Committee was indeed the hub of hearings aimed at , especially as special counsel Robert Mueller conducted his investigation into whether the campaign colluded with Russia to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, and then later obstructed justice.

But as Congress returned to Washington in September after the August recess, the center of gravity was already shifting away from Nadler and toward the three other committees. Yahoo News reported this “shift to Schiff” on Sept. 24.

On Sept. 9, the Oversight and Foreign Affairs Committees together sent letters to White House counsel Pat Cipollone and to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo about their concerns that and his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani had “acted outside legitimate law enforcement and diplomatic channels to coerce the Ukrainian government into pursuing two politically motivated investigations under the guise of anticorruption activity.”

Story continues

Rep. Matt Gaetz addresses the media on Capitol Hill, Oct. 14, 2019. (Photo: Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images)

Rep. Matt Gaetz addresses the media on Capitol Hill, Oct. 14, 2019. (Photo: Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images)

sonos sonos One (Gen 2) - Voice Controlled Smart Speaker with Amazon Alexa Built-in - Black read more
Rep. Matt Gaetz addresses the media on Capitol Hill, Oct. 14, 2019. (Photo: Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images)

The letters asked the White House and State Department to provide all documentation and correspondence related to this issue.

This was over a week before news first broke that a whistleblower inside the intelligence community had filed an official complaint on Aug. 12 with the Office of Inspector General of the Intelligence Community about ’s July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. But the whistleblower also spoke with staff at Schiff’s intelligence community before filing his complaint, so it’s possible that staff at Oversight and Foreign Affairs sent their Sept. 9 letters with that information in mind.

The letters came from Oversight and Foreign Affairs because Oversight has jurisdiction for the executive branch and Foreign Affairs has jurisdiction over the State Department. The intelligence community has jurisdiction over itself, and since the whistleblower is a member of the intelligence community, it was a straightforward process for Pelosi to make Schiff the new point person.

“Committees are engaged based on their jurisdiction and prior investigations into related issues,” said a House Democratic leadership aide.

After the White House and State Department ignored a second set of letters on Sept. 24, the congressional committees issued subpoenas on Oct. 4, which carry significant legal weight. If does not comply with a congressional subpoena, Congress could vote on an article of impeachment for obstruction of Congress.

In addition, Nadler’s Sept. 17 Judiciary Committee hearing with Corey Lewandowski, a former campaign official and adviser, was widely viewed among Democrats as a disaster and an embarrassment.

Pelosi’s dissatisfaction with Nadler’s performance, combined with the natural jurisdiction of the other three committees over separate elements of the Ukraine matter, were the justification for shifting the impeachment inquiry into its current setting.

Gaetz wasn’t allowed to attend Monday morning’s testimony simply because he’s not on a committee with jurisdiction over the subject of the deposition. And House rules give committee chairman wide latitude over how to run hearings and depositions.

Read more from Yahoo News:

all right reserved for yahoo news

Get the latest news delivered to your inbox

Follow us on social media networks

NEXT UN keeps Darfur peacekeepers but hopes for their departure