Prince Charles has become embroiled in a major art scandal
Prince Charles has become embroiled in a major art scandal following allegations that a painting at one of his favourite stately homes is an audacious fake – and not the £50 million Monet it was claimed to be.
An American forger says he, not the 19th Century French impressionist, painted the image of water lilies that hung at Dumfries House, the headquarters of The Prince's Foundation. It has now been removed from public view.
This newspaper has also seen evidence that two other artworks there – purporting to be a £42 million Picasso and a £12 million Dali – are also counterfeit.
They are among 17 paintings on loan to the house from bankrupt businessman James Stunt, the former husband of Formula 1 heiress Petra Ecclestone.
A Prince's Foundation spokesman last night confirmed: 'Dumfries House accepts artwork on loan from time to time from individuals and organisations.
'It is extremely regrettable that the authenticity of these particular paintings, which are no longer on display, now appears to be in doubt.'
Yesterday American artist Tony Tetro, who was once sentenced to six months in prison for art forgery, told The Mail on Sunday he had painted the pictures and sold them to Mr Stunt.
An American forger says he, not Claude Monet, painted this image of water lilies that hung at Dumfries House
They are among 17 paintings on loan to the house, including a supposed £42million Picasso (pictured)
Mr Tetro today makes a legal living replicating masterpieces for private use by clients in their homes and offices, and said Mr Stunt acquired 11 such pieces.
He said: 'You can impress your friends with my pictures, decorate your home with them, but they would never pass expert scrutiny.'
All 17 of James Stunt's pictures were on a ten-year, free lease to Dumfries House
Of the pictures on loan to The Prince's Foundation, he said: 'I don't want any part of this. It has got to be stopped now rather than later. I'm told these pictures went to Dumfries House. There is no question about it: James knew they were mine.'
When approached by this newspaper, Dumfries House said there had already been concerns about the disputed 'Monet', and that it had been removed from public view. All 17 pictures loaned by Mr Stunt have now been taken down and returned to him.
However, this version of events is disputed by the former bullion dealer, who insisted: 'None of my stuff is fake.'
This newspaper has seen loan agreements between Mr Stunt and Dumfries House for the three 'fake' paintings complete with purported insurance valuations for a total of £104 million.
The documents also include a claim that the prestigious Wildenstein Institute in Paris had authenticated the pieces. The institute is a globally acknowledged art authority unrivalled in its expertise on Monet. No one there could not be reached for comment yesterday.
American artist Tony Tetro (pictured), who was once sentenced to six months in prison for art forgery, said he had painted the pictures
The £12million Dali in question is a crucifixion scene entitled Dying Christ (pictured)
The 'Monet' is entitled Lily Pads 1882; the 'Picasso' depicts two stylised figures on a beach and is called Liberated Bathers; while the 'Dali' is a crucifixion scene entitled Dying Christ.
All 17 of Stunt's pictures were on a ten-year, free lease to Dumfries House, with the loan agreements signed by Michael Fawcett, Charles's former valet who is now the £95,000-a-year chief executive of the Prince's Foundation. A spokesman for the foundation said all decisions about artwork are made by the charity, not Prince Charles personally.
Perhaps it was the Lamborghini. Or maybe it was the Rolls-Royce and the two Ferraris – but Tony Tetro's neighbours were convinced that the man with no discernible day job was a drug dealer.
The truth, however, was much more fascinating and, when the police finally came for him in 1989, they weren't searching for drugs but paintings.
Tetro, a former altar boy from New York, was arrested for art forgery involving works by Dali, Rockwell, Joan Miro and Marc Chagall that had been sold at a Los Angeles gallery for £75,000.
In court, he admitted painting the artworks but said he believed that they would be sold as reproductions, not originals.
After a four-and-a-half-year trial, which left him penniless, he was found guilty of attempted theft and six counts of art forgery and in a plea deal agreed to serve six months in prison.
But he was allowed to keep working providing it was made clear the works were fake. Now 70, he has reinvented himself as an art expert, even appearing on BBC1's Fake Or Fortune.
But a recent trip to see how Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel frescos had been restored left him disappointed. 'I preferred the original,' he said.
Mr Fawcett has enjoyed an extraordinary rise to influence, despite having been forced to resign from royal service twice.
The first time was in 1998 amid allegations of bullying, the second was in 2003 when he was found to have been selling off official gifts on Charles's orders. He was accused of pocketing a percentage of the proceeds but cleared by an internal inquiry of any financial misconduct.
Before being put in charge of Charles's entire charity empire following a reorganisation last year, Mr Fawcett – who once reputedly squeezed toothpaste on to the Prince's toothbrush after he broke his arm playing polo – was chief executive of Dumfries House Trust for five years.
The Palladian mansion in Ayrshire was saved for the nation by Prince Charles in 2007. He headed a consortium which bought it for £45 million, of which £20 million was a loan borrowed against his charitable foundation.
The house had a sparse art collection so has borrowed works from established collections including the Scottish National Gallery and the Bute family, the Scottish aristocrats who owned the 2,000-acre estate before its acquisition by the Prince's consortium. The long-term loan of artworks is standard practice at many historic houses.
Mr Stunt is a well-known art collector and has previously boasted of having sent works by Monet, Van Dyck, Dali, Picasso, Velazquez, Constable and Chagall to Dumfries House and a number of other leading institutions.
It is understood the three 'fakes' were all accepted in good faith and that The Prince's Foundation was not responsible for verifying the authenticity of the paintings.
Mr Stunt was made bankrupt with debts of up to £14 million in June this year, with the judge calling his behaviour towards his long list of creditors 'appalling'. He has long been known for his colourful and extravagant lifestyle. In 2011, he and Petra bought a 123-room mansion in Los Angeles – said to be the city's largest private home – for £67.5 million and at one time he had a fleet of 200 supercars and a wine cellar worth £400,000.
The disputed paintings hung at Dumfries House (pictured), the headquarters of The Prince's Foundation
Mr Stunt married Ms Ecclestone in 2011, after meeting on a blind date five years earlier, and they have three children. However, their marriage foundered and they settled a £5.5 billion divorce in October 2017. Mr Stunt said of the pictures he loaned to Dumfries House: 'None of these pictures have come back, they are all there. No Monet has come back to me because it is not real.
'None of my stuff is fake. When it comes to art, when it is in Wildenstein, it cannot be fake.'The £50million conundrum: Where IS the 'fake' Monet painting that hung at Prince Charles's Dumfries House?
The walls of the Picture Gallery in Prince Charles's Dumfries House are a vivid emerald, an appropriate colour given the artistic gems it holds.
There are Dutch masterpieces from the 17th Century and one of world's most dazzling collections of Chippendale chairs. A series of antique clocks bought after the Prince suggested the great Palladian mansion in Ayrshire 'lacked a heartbeat' add to the sense that this is a place where art matters.
Yet Dumfries House has now been revealed to be at the centre of some of the most audacious claims of art fakery in royal history.
Among the masters: The emerald-hued walls of the Picture Gallery in Dumfries House - home to the charity of Prince Charles. Pictured: where the alleged forgeries hung until they were removed
For it was into this illustrious company of artworks that James Stunt, the bankrupt, bling-loving former husband of Formula 1 heiress Petra Ecclestone, is claimed to have inserted three replica paintings.
They had allegedly been knocked up on a kitchen table in California by Tony Tetro, a man who once served a prison sentence for art fraud.sonos sonos One (Gen 2) - Voice Controlled Smart Speaker with Amazon Alexa Built-in - Black read more
Tetro ages his canvases with splashes of black coffee and bleach. 'With the coffee you can smell it sometimes,' he says. 'If you put your tongue on to it you can even taste it.
He dips the copper tacks which stretch the canvases over wood in vinegar to make them look antique. And it's his expert application of a brown pigment called umber, diluted with linseed oil, which finally gives the paintings the yellowed appearance of an old masterpiece.
Tetro claims three of his pieces hung in Dumfries House, including the fake Monet, designed to look like one of the 250 studies the great French impressionist made of the water lilies in the garden at his home in Giverny in Normandy, all blues and greens and shots of lemon. 'I was very proud of that,' says Tetro. 'It was a good Monet.'
There was a striking 'Dali', glossy and dark, of the crucified Christ. And finally there was an unmistakeable 'Picasso' of people at the seaside, resembling the artist's 1937 masterpiece On The Beach.
The paintings had allegedly been knocked up on a kitchen table in California by