Supreme Court rules police can NOT always enter a home without a warrant during ...

Supreme Court rules police can NOT always enter a home without a warrant during ...
Supreme Court rules police can NOT always enter a home without a warrant during ...

The Supreme Court on Wednesday put limits on when police officers pursuing a fleeing suspect can enter a home without a warrant, adding to the country's ongoing discussion of the extent of police powers.

In a 7-2 decision, the high court ruled that when officers are pursuing someone suspected of a misdemeanor, a less serious crime, they cannot always enter a home without a warrant if a suspect enters.

The court had previously given police greater freedom to enter homes in cases involving more serious crimes. In a 1976 case, the justices said that police in 'hot pursuit' of a suspect believed to have committed a felony can enter a home without a warrant.

The case the justices decided Wednesday is important both to law enforcement and to groups concerned about privacy. 

But it doesn't give police a bright line for when they can and cannot enter a home to pursue someone suspected of committing a misdemeanor.

Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the majority opinion: 'The flight of a suspected misdemeanant does not always justify a warrantless entry into a home. An officer must consider all the circumstances in a pursuit case to determine whether there is a law enforcement emergency. On many occasions, the officer will have good reason to enter - to prevent imminent harms of violence, destruction of evidence, or escape from the home. But when the officer has time to get a warrant, he must do so - even though the misdemeanant fled.' 

The case the justices decided Wednesday is important both to law enforcement and to groups concerned about privacy

The case the justices decided Wednesday is important both to law enforcement and to groups concerned about privacy

The majority opinion for seven members of the court that included both liberals and conservatives.

The minority, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, said in their view a suspect's choice to flee alone should give police the ability to pursue that person into a home.

 They suggested the majority's opinion leaves too much for officers in the field to consider in the midst of a chase, providing 'no guidance at all.'

'The Constitution does not demand this absurd and dangerous result,' Roberts wrote. 

Police experts cautioned that the ruling could complicate matters for police officers, who may not know the extent of a suspect's background or crimes during a pursuit, and endager the public.

'When someone flees

read more from dailymail.....

PREV Nikki Haley is still raking in hundreds of thousands of votes two weeks after ... trends now
NEXT Cassidy Hutchinson's January 6 claim Trump lunged at Secret Service agents ... trends now