Biden's DOJ concluded in a court filing that Brooks was not acting in his official government capacity when he spoke to Trump supporters ahead of the MAGA riot. If he had been, the government would have stepped in as a defendant in his place.Insurance Loans Mortgage Attorney Credit Lawyer
'The record indicates that Brooks's appearance at the January 6 rally was campaign activity, and it is in no part of the business of the United States to pick sides among candidates in federal elections,' the decision read.
Rep. Mo Brooks (left) will not be replaced as defendant by the federal government in a lawsuit brought by Rep. Eric Swalwell (right) over the MAGA riot because the DOJ argues Brooks was not acting in his official capacity as a government employee at a Trump rally on January 6th
Shortly before violent Trump supporters clashed with Capitol and DC police, the Alabama lawmaker told the cheering crowd at the 'Save America' rally to 'stop at the Capitol' and encouraged 'American patriots' to '[take] down names and [kick] ass.'
The DOJ called Brooks's 'request for certification and conduct' of his actions 'unprecedented.'
Federal attorneys argued the government could not defend Brooks because if allegations against him are proven true, they would 'plainly fall outside the scope of employment for an officer or employee of the United States.'
'Conspiring to prevent the lawful certification of the 2020 election and to injure Members of Congress and inciting the riot