Social media bosses could face up to YEAR in jail for failing to hand over data ... trends now
Many social media users are more eager to share news online than check if it is true, a study has found.
Researchers found that Facebook and Twitter users were often too distracted to check if their posts were accurate.
David Rand, a professor of brain and cognitive sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said this was not because they were 'immoral' but more likely because of the environment in which we consume news on the platforms.
For the US study, more than 3,000 people were shown a series of true and false headlines about politics and the pandemic.
Participants were asked either how accurate the content was or whether they wanted to share it.
Researchers found that Facebook and Twitter users were often too distracted to check if their posts were accurate
At other times they were asked both questions.
The authors said the results allowed them to work out how posting content affected the ability of the person sharing it to decide whether it was true or not.
They found participants who were first asked about sharing the content before they were asked about its accuracy were 35 per cent worse at telling truths from falsehoods.
Too distracted to check accuracy
Professor Rand, co-author of the paper, said: 'Just asking people whether they want to share things makes them more likely to believe headlines they wouldn't otherwise have believed, and less likely to believe headlines they would have believed.'
However, he said this was because of a 'generalised distraction', which was indicative of how we consume news on social media, rather than attempts to deceive one another.
The academic, whose study was published
