Tiger Woods ex Erica Herman claims she was locked out of his Hobe Sound home ... trends now
Tiger Woods' former girlfriend, who is suing him to void an NDA she claims she was forced to sign, filed a separate case against him in December alleging that he kicked her out of their shared home and demanding $30million for the emotional damages.
Erica Herman claims in court papers obtained by DailyMail.com that agents working for Woods persuaded her to leave the $48million home to go on a short vacation but when she got to the airport they told her she was locked out of the property.
Herman claims that Woods' representatives removed $40,000 of her money made 'scurrilous and defamatory allegations' about how she got the money.
She is demanding more than $30million for what she claims are 'breaches of duty' that left her suffering 'severe' emotional damages.
According to Herman, she should have been allowed to live in the home in Hobe Sound, Florida, for another five years but Woods used 'trickery' after breaking up with her in October.
Tiger Woods and ex Erica Herman split after six years of dating and she's now taking him to court over an NDA she claims she was forced to sign
DailyMail.com can reveal that she filed a separate case against him in December alleging that he kicked her out of his $48m Florida home
The complaint says that she provided 'valuable services' at Woods' requests as part of an 'oral tenancy agreement.' Herman says this gave her the right to live in the property for a 'certain duration of time'
DailyMail.com has contacted lawyers for Woods and Herman.
Herman sued the Jupiter Island Irrevocable Homestead Trust, which owns the home in Hobe Sound she lived at with Woods for six years while they were together.
The complaint says that she provided 'valuable services' at Woods' requests as part of an 'oral tenancy agreement.'
Herman says this gave her the right to live in the property for a 'certain duration of time.'
The lawsuit, filed as a trust litigation, states: 'All expenses that related to (Herman's) residency were fully paid by the defendant or its privies.
'This agreement was fully performed for the six-year period prior to the events giving rise to this lawsuit.
'The duties that were performed by the plaintiff were extensive and of an extraordinary nature in light of the overall
