End of Boris and co peddling dodgy data? Government to get statistics ...

End of Boris and co peddling dodgy data? Government to get statistics ...
End of Boris and co peddling dodgy data? Government to get statistics ...

Ministers will be given a 'data masterclass' in the coming weeks to address the issue of 'statistical illiteracy' within Government. 

The crash courses have already been running in the civil service but will now be given to senior ministers in the coming weeks. 

It is a direct response to criticisms by Britain's statistics watchdog over the way Covid data has been presented during the pandemic.

The Office for Statistics Regulation argued that data presented to the public was 'not always supported by transparent information provided in a timely manner.' 

Testing data and Covid death numbers used to justify the second lockdown were two areas where the Government was scolded in the past.

It is not known who in Cabinet will be attending the masterclasses and if Prime Minister Boris Johnson will be among them. 

The country's top statistician said the workshops have proven successful, but also acknowledged the problem won't be fixed like 'flicking a switch'. 

'Next slide please', the catchphrase of Professor Chris Whitty (pictured), was one of the key phrases heard during communication of pandemic at the Covid press briefings

'Next slide please', the catchphrase of Professor Chris Whitty (pictured), was one of the key phrases heard during communication of pandemic at the Covid press briefings

Sir Patrick Vallance, No10's Chief Scientific Adviser, suggested there could be a shocking 4,000 deaths per day by December 20 if nothing was done using a now-infamous graph. The scenario was based on the assumption that there would be 1,000 per day by the start of November. Real numbers of people dying were significantly lower

Sir Patrick Vallance, No10's Chief Scientific Adviser, suggested there could be a shocking 4,000 deaths per day by December 20 if nothing was done using a now-infamous graph. The scenario was based on the assumption that there would be 1,000 per day by the start of November. Real numbers of people dying were significantly lower

The masterclasses were described by the UK's National Statistician Professor Sir Ian Diamond while being questioned by MPs from The Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Select Committee.

MP for Inverclyde Ronnie Cowan asked what was being done to help Government understand the data presented by statisticians.

How the government has been criticised for handling data in the pandemic

In November Britain's statistics watchdog criticised Number 10 for not being transparent enough with the data used to justify England's second lockdown

The UK Statistics Authority argued that numbers presented to the public have not always been backed up by 'transparent information in a timely manner'.

In a statement, UKSA said that when data is used in public briefings, it should be made clear the source of the information and the full figures behind it.

The UKSA said that when modelling was referred to publicly – particularly to inform significant policy decisions – the 'model outputs, methodologies and key assumptions' should be published at the same time. 

It was not the first time the watchdog had scolded Government on its handling of data.

In June 2020, the UKSA chairman Sir David Norgrove wrote to the Health Secretary at the time, Matt Hancock, stating that the information on testing is 'far from complete' and 'misleading'.

It came after Mr Hancock announced the UK had exceeded its target to

read more from dailymail.....

NEXT UK's prostate cancer revolution: 'Biggest trial in a generation' could lead to ... trends now